Dear Gurus,
In MCE7 Report Invoiced qty is more than the GR Quantity, but in PO history it shows correct GR vs IV Qty.
What could be be issue with MCE7 Report.
Baalu
Dear Gurus,
In MCE7 Report Invoiced qty is more than the GR Quantity, but in PO history it shows correct GR vs IV Qty.
What could be be issue with MCE7 Report.
Baalu
Hi Experts,
Is there a Standard SAP Report to detect retro-active changes to HR master data and identify the list of employees (before a live payroll run) for whom payroll is going to trigger retroactively ?
Regards,
Somdeb.
Dear Gurus,
We want to restrict back date posting for Goods Issue . For example if material reservation date is 28.02.13 the system should not allow the user to post issue before 28.02.2013 .
pl. guide for any configuration changes or any user exit required.
Thanks
Himanshu
Hi,
We are using inspection type 01, 04, 05 etc, when we take customer return thru Movment type 655, and then system create inspection lot, and then usage decision. In some cases where we have posted usage decision, some time we need to cancel UD, means we have to create the stock again in quality stock, but we don't want to use sap note 175842. However we are ok with mb1b/322 and inspection type but it is also creating inspection lot in movement type 311 which we donot want.
How to handle this situation.
Regards
Rajeev Gupta
Hi,
I have created a 360 degree appraisal template with Template mode as " Make Anonymous When closing with registration".
However, am unable to register the participants via phap_prepare_pa as the 360 degree appraisal template name is not visible in the drop down list. Any ideas to overcome this?
Thanks,
Sachin
Dear All,
After creating and releasing process order - COR1, reservation automatically created with huge quantity. Some time system will not allow to create process order and throws abap dump with error CX_SY_ARITHMETIC_OVERFLOW.
To resolve this we have to do TECHO of old process order.
Is reservation required? Can we disable creating reservation without affecting future transactions ?
Thanks and Regards,
Nirav
Hi,
I have defined a new plant (2125) and a storage location to it (0001). I have performed the steps in OX10 (created plant), OX17 (assigned it to a purchasing org.), OX18 (assigned it to company), OX09 (created storage loc, including address), OVX6 (connected plant to sales org), OVXC (connected shipping points), OVL2 (shipping point determination), OMWD (connected it to a Valuation grp), OMS2 (updated the material types) and updated all relevant values in the tables T001W and T001K. I have checked and double cheked all values and they are matching the once I have for the plants/storage locations that works.
I then go into OMJ1 and see the plant here. I can also check of the valuation area for negativ stock and save. When I highlite the valuation area and click the plant, there is no plant there. I can click Storage location and enter the plan manually, then I see "Neg.stock" tickoff box. If I tick it off and try to save, I get a error message saying 'Corresponding entry in "Plant" missing'.
If I check in OMJ5, the new plant is not even visible - only all the old plants.
Can somebody pls help me with this problem? It has frustrated me for 2 days now :-(.
If it's of any importance, I run the Joint Venture for SAP AIO, Oil&Gas and we implemented it 2 years ago
S.
Hi,
While cancelling the IV through MR8M, we encounter and error like.
"Balance Not Zero", there is a difference in debit and credit amount there by blocking the IV document to cancel.
I have seen some thread with the same issue, also checked the reference Note[1631737]
Note 1631737 - MIRO/MR8M: Balance error M8285/M8186
As per the note I went on to check the config settings in our system
We have settings like
Purchase account management is not active
Account Key & Accruals are not identical
Actually the IV with a higher amount by mistakenly has been posted by Accounts person, hence needs to be cancelled immediately.
So that a fresh IV can be done.
Please help.........
regards
rick
Dear Experts,
As per our business requirement, we have decided to apply planning strategy 50,, strategy that we have assigned for FG product
First, we have planned the requirement quantities in MD61 for FG product
MRP has been run for FG, Planned order generated but it is non convertible.this is because rule of strategy 50.
when we try to convert the planned orders of semi finished, same non convertible window is coming. hence we are not in a position to convert to Production order or purchase requisitions for Raw materials.
What could be the missing s in the scenario . How can we overcome this situation. any configuration side settings are required.
Thanks in advance.
Dear Experts,
We had Migration database system from Oracle to SYBASE & also upgrade SAP Version from ECC 6.00 TO EHP6.
Now when we have Transfer 50% balance credit through J2I8, system given error message ' Excise modvat accounts not defined for CAPE transaction and A5 excise group' Message no. 8I402
The same message occurred only where we had post the Cenvat credit with t code J1IH > with Sub Transaction type 'CR'
Also it is happen in OLD Oracle server with same combination.(we have kept the same server for testing purpose)
Please guide
Thanks & Regards
BK GAIKWAD
For tracebility purpose the vendor batch to be linked to the dummy batch created during confirmation. The link should be such that 1 dummy batch will be linked to n no, of vendor batches. Tracebility from raw material stage to finished goods.
But existng t code co11n we can have 1:1 relationship i.e., 1 dummy batch to 1 vendor batch
Please advice me how to get desires result i.e 1 dummy batch to n vendor batch.
Regards,
Nag
Dear Experts
I seek to know the functionality of "value set - Define allowed values " in CU60 of the variant tables.
Thanks & regards
Aman
HI Experts,
I want to update batch characteristics via MIC characteristics.
I have 10 materials for which accepted moisture content range is different, so I have kept the values as blank in the created batch characteristics like BATCH_CHARAC. While creating Mater Inspection characteristics like MIC_CHARAC, I used BATCH_CHARAC as class characteristics reference for automatic update. Now when going to create inspection plan for 10 materials, I could not able to put the accepted range. for Mat 1: 10-15, for mat2: 50-60 etc.
Do we have any solution?
PLease help.
Thanks
Krishna
Dears
we have a customizing info type which check a value of another info type field and compare it with the entry the user entered if not match it give us error , i don't know how the check is implemented any clue ?
dear all
i am new to SAP, i want to learn MM, i need your help to find an official Training Documents for "SAP ECC 6.0" MM module.
thanks,
Hello,
I am trying to perform time evaluation (PT60) pragmatically from web dynpro abap.
being in web dynpro abap prevents me from using submit report command.
I found some functions that seem relevant (for example HR_TIME_EVALUATION), but i have no idea how to correctly call them.
thanks alot for any help provided!
Eli
Hi All,
I am facing two issues in KE30 - Profitability Reports and need some guidance:
1. When I create a report in T.code- KE31 using the 'Report with Form' option, I am not able to get the From Period and To Period option in the variables option so that I can get the same the selection screen option.
What is the way for bringing the From Period and To Period option at the selection screen so that the user can enter the period at the time of executing the report.?
2. What is the way to get the multiple selection option in case of KE30 report created using the Basic Report option. There we are unable to get the multiple selection option in the option of 'Record Type' and we require it. I have followed the stepas mentioned in thread http://scn.sap.com/thread/1511697 and also implement the mentioned note in the thread but unable to do. Please guide the way to get the multiple selection option for Record Type.
Hi gurus,
on our SAP project we have material ledger with repetetive manufacturing (REM).
The client requires to calculate actual costing for each batch following actual multi level consumptions.
From what i know Material ledger works level by level and, due to REM production, it's not able to calculate real actual costing by batch. See the following example.
- production of 1000 pce of SFG (batch 1) consuming 1000 kg of ingredient
- production of 1000 pce of SFG (batch 2) consuming 500 kg of ingredient
then
- production of 1000 pce of FG (batch 1) consuming 1000 kg of SFG (batch 1)
- production of 1000 pce of FG (batch 2) consuming 1000 kg of SFG (batch 2)
Production of SFG batch1 was more efficient then the batch 2, and conseguently the actual cost of batch1 of FG should be better than the batch 2. But that efficiency has not any impact on FG actual costing.
In fact actual costing of FG will consider the total values and apply an average: 2000 pce of FG produced and 2000 pce of SFG consumed, where the 2000 pce of SFG have been produced consuming 1500 kg of ingredient; at the end it means (for material ledger) that to produce 1000 pce of FG we consumed on average 750 kg of ingredient.
I tried applying valuation category X (by batch) on material master data (accounting 1) but results were no good. Any batch has the same actual costing (looking to the below example, SFG batch 1 has the same actual costing of SFG batch2).
The only way i found is to use a specific and different cost collectors for each production confirmation but it is not applicable (would be too complex to be manage).
Anybody have experience on this issue or have an advice?
Best regards
Marco
Hi ,
How to Block all the Line item Mass Block in Purchase Order , Because i unable to set Deletion flog, Kindly tell me
Regards,
Ranganath
Hi ,
in PO order qty 1000 nos i received 50 nos still balance 50 , like this i have lot of Po , how to close all the open item in mass kindly give me idea pls
Regards,
Ranganath