Hi experts,
In independent requirement screen, planning table is showing only one column instead of multiple column, so that i can't be able to plan for more days or weeks, months.
Please find the below screen shot
Please guide us how get the multiple columns
Thanks in advance
Hi Guru,
It the first time we have such issue, when garnishment document was not created and withheld during payroll run. Employee has 2 off-cycle payments that are not included in garnishment base. Then in the following regular run garnishment was not created and deducted.
Please help me to understand as why this is happening.
Regards
Abhay
Hi Guru,
It the first time we have such issue, when garnishment document was not created and withheld during payroll run. Employee has 2 off-cycle payments that are not included in garnishment base. Then in the following regular run garnishment was not created and deducted.
Please help me to understand as why this is happening.
Regards
Abhay
Hello,
I am presently working on the invoice match scenario.
We always accept vendor discounts in dollar amount. I have created a header condition type with calculation type 'B' (Fixed Amount) and group condition set so that it trickles down at line item level based on quantity/value.
My scenario:
PO:
Header Condition Type : 20 USD
Line Item 10: Qty 5 , Unit price = 10 = 50
Header Discount = 6.67
Line Item 20: Qty 10 , Unit price = 10 = 100
Header Discount = 13.33
We do a GR for entire quantity for both line items
Now for example if vendor sends invoice
Line Item 10: Qty 4 , Unit price = 10 = 40
Line Item 20: Qty 8 , Unit price = 10 = 80
There is a quantity variance in both line items.
So when I do a MIRO and change the system proposed qty. and amount to the vendor sent quantities and amounts, in the 'Edit Own item conditions' the item condition value (from header condition type) does not change based on the new amounts. It remains the same as PO value.
The same works fine and automatically if the header condition type had a calculation type 'Percentage'.
Please suggest a solution for the same.
Dear Experts.
How are you all, i want to update the employer contribution in sap. I store the employee eobi contribution in 5000 wage type and system automatically calculate employee contribution. Currently its 4 % of Basic salary . I want to update as 5%.The data is not store in 5010 Wage type(EOBI EMPLOYER CONTRIBUTION). Employer contribution only apply in PCR and schema. If i change the EOBI employer contribution in Current month. Its impact on current payroll or previous payroll also. I attached the screen shot.
Thanks in Advance.
Regards
Jazib Tariq
Dear Friends,
In Purchase Order, Short text is copied to Miro PO Text, but when miro is being posted to FI, the PO Text is not being copied to Text field in T.code FD03.
This is happening only in Company Code 3000, Rest all other company codes are working fine without this problem.
Please suggest how to overcome this problem?
Regards
Sridhar
Dear Experts,
Tcode-VL01N
While doing PGI Account determination Error-Account 40111100 requires an assignment to a CO object while posting PGI
Delivery Doc-80000016(Created with reference to sales order, SP-100001, SA-1000
I have checked in FSOO Field Status Variant was optional.
In KAO2 under default account assignment: no cost centre is maintained.
In OKB9 for the particular cost element account assignment is set as 1 valuation area is mandatory.
And under valuation area 1000 level cost center maintained for the cost element 40111100.
No previous Tread has solved my issue
How can i resolve the issue..??
Thanks in Advance
Ssrao
Hi,
I have a query about material issue against production order, for example: I have created one production order as it header qty is 100.according to this store dept need to be issued the same qty of raw material. I have noticed that sometimes user doing double times issue against the same order .so system need to check goods issues are happening as per production order here system should not allow the double issue against the same order, please let me know is there any user exit & badi which i can apply for this restriction.
Regards
Jinto joy
Dear SAP Expert,
When i am maintain Infotype 590 - Long Term Reimbursement i am getting an error
"Hard Furnishing Scheme is not available for 10001108 on 07.05.2013"
Please can one help me in resolving this issue.
Thanks & Regards
Saroj
Hi,
If by mistake standard PO created instead of Import PO, GR & MIRO posted without entry of custom MIRO and also Material has been consumed. Now is there any provision to post custom MIRO entry??
Hi Experts,
Can anyone please suggest how to check if employee is missed in payroll run.?
I have FM "PYXX_READ_PAYROLL_RESULT" to get the payroll results. Based on RT table values is there any
possibility to infer employee is missed in payroll or employee is not required to paid?
Please suggest.Points will be given for helpful answers.
Thanks
Prabaharan
Just finished an upgrade to ERP 6 EhP6 from R/3 4.7 Enterprise running on Oracle 11.2.0.3. Now I need to do a system copy. I noticed that ERP6 software distributions don't come with non-Unicode anymore. In my situation, my source system is non-Unicode and the target system, which can only be installed as an Unicode system. Traditionally, I do system copy using BRBACKUP/BRRESTORE and then generate a CONTROL.SQL file on my source system and then generate control files in my target system, then bring up the database. Works every time!
Now I'm having problem and wondering if the Unicode vs. non-Unicode could be the problem. Hmmm... Is there anyone out there with this experience?
Thanks,
Hi,
This discussion is raise in reference to an existing discussion
- Example of RVAB02 PP from IDES
rasied by Vaishnavi Tangirala
Hi
Can anyone give me an example of how RVAB02 PP works from IDES? I want an example how accounting entries look like for Sales price inclusive of tax.
I have a problem now that tax code is not getting copied to the Revenue line in accounting doc since iam calculating tax on gross price and not on price after tax.
I will be very grateful for any help regarding this.
Thanks,
Vaishnavi
May I know how was this issue resolved? I am encountering the same problem now.
Thanks,
Leng
Message highlighted in blue was edited & added by: Jyoti Prakash
Hi
We are facing an error in Payroll due to nongenarating the wage type /3I8. Payroll is not processing for the Employees who have an entry in Infotype 0585 for the Investment code Rajiv Gandhi Equity Saving Scheme (deduction u/s 80CCG). This error is coming for both the entries made for 2013-14 and in previous year 2012-13. This inconsistency occured after applying the patch levels 91 to 94. Up to the Patch level 90 payroll ran smooth without errors.
After applying the patches 91 to 94 The wage type /3I8 got missed in the tables V_512W_D, V_T54c3. Processing class 51 also missing in the V_512W_D after applying the patches 91 to 94.
Request to support in resolving the issue
Thanks & Regards
EKP YADAV
Dear Expert,
We have processed Consigment transfer and are going to be done consignment issue, while creating the PGI system gives following error messages;-
Deficit of Customer stock unr. 98,100 EA : material no. plant batch no. 0000009157.
Please find screen shot of stock for your reference.
Please guide me as early as possible.
Regards,
Manoranjan.
Hi,
Could you please any body tell me is there any standard overview page for Infotye 585 & 586 for Sec80 & Sec80c deductions update in ESS Portal ?
Shall I have to create custom overview page with the above two links .
Regards,
Praveen Chitturi.
Dear Experts,
I am getting the below mentioned error in IT0585, and unable to save. I searched for the same on Google, and found many such queries being posted...but I am unable to understand. The error is as below:
Please help to solve the issue.
Thanks and Regards,
Bhagyashree
Dear PS Gurus,
What is difference between PR created from network(Pur indicator =PF) & PR created from MRP run.( Purchase indicator= WF-Reservation)
We still want 'Project Valuated stock' for Raw materials but customer wants PR created using MRP run(MD51) instead of directly from network . So we used Pur Indicator= "Reservation against" ... instead of PF which creates PR on Release of WBS. Once project is released MRP run creates PR as reservation already there.
PR are different( Suspect , it may have different behavior ) for example MRP created PR can be deleted & when in MD04 , don't have * while one created directly from netowrk has * against it & cannot be deleted( Deletion bin is grey out) Also 'Closed' field is grey out as well.
I would expect this as process difference & should not generate objects with different attribute. Able to delete PR created from MRP seems like it is not tied to commitment or something missing.
All account assignment fields are populated in same way in both cases
Any insight to this?
Best Regards,
Jatin
Hi Guys,
I had a Purchase Requisition that was converted from planned order, it was created several days ago and I did see it in ME53N. But today when I was trying to display the PR in ME53N, it throws a message "Purchase requisition does no exist". I checked the table EBAN the PR is not there.
In this forum I found some similar discussions on the same issue, but it was referring to PR which was generated automatically by MRP run, but in my situation the PR is converted from planned order, I'm not sure if this is related to MRP settings.
Can anybody provide some suggestions on my issue? Thanks in advance.
Danny
Dear All,
STO
We are working on a IS-Retail Scenario where we are dealing with generic articles. While creating a PO, we have encountered an error which says:"Also specify a delivery type in case of shipping data relevance". The error message number is MEPO 099. We have checked that Delivery type NL is attached to the document type under the supplying site customizing, and supplying site is attached to the receiving site with the correct document type. Can anybody throw some light on what we might be missing out in this scenario?
best Regards,
Ttony