Quantcast
Channel: SCN : Unanswered Discussions - Enterprise Resource Planning (SAP ERP)
Viewing all 2436 articles
Browse latest View live

Different requirements for Vendor Evaluation under same purchase org

$
0
0

Hello,

 

I have recently started configuring vendor evaluation for my company and have run into a couple questions. For the purchase org we are configuring, there are two weight keys that were requested, one for commodities (which weighs price as the highest) and one for special materials (which weighs price and delivery highest).  The issue I have run into is that for commodities, we do not want to use the automatic criteria for delivery (on time delivery, quantity, etc) as our vendors send product by rail, and once they put it in the railcar they have no control over how long it takes to get to us, however, we want to use the automatic criteria for special materials. I have tried doing this a couple ways with no great solution...

 

The first thing I tried was creating a new main criterion called “Delivery (Manual)” with a manual subcriterion. Then, for the commodity weight key, adding only that main criterion instead of the normal “03 Delivery” sap standard criterion, and vice versa for our special materials.  This resulted in an error of the weight keys not being maintained for the purchase org.

 

After, I added all of the criterion for both weight keys and added “0” as the weighting for the fields I don’t want, however, it still calculates, and shows in the vendor evaluation (but does not change the total score).  This is confusing to the users, looks messy and would prefer to not have to do it this way.

 

The last thing I tried was only using the standard delivery criterion, and adding a manual field, but there is no way to distinguish between weight keys calculate what so that didn't work.

 

I was wondering if anyone else has run into the same problem or if anyone has a better cleaner solution to set up the vendor evaluation for this purchase org.

 

 

Any help is appreciated!


Pricing error while creating billing

$
0
0

Hi Experts,

 

We have created 2 table in access sequence.

 

20    Sales org./Distr. Chl/Bill to/Variant 

30    Sales org./Distr. Chl/Division/Bill to/Variant

 

Exclusive indicator is checked for both the tables and condition record is maintained for both.

 

Now when we create an order in combination with 'Sales org./Distr. Chl/Division/Bill to/Variant'

system is not picking price from 30 table it is picking for 20 table.

 

What is the reason?? is it happening because we set exclusive indicator for both the table 20, 30 please clarify.

 

 

 

Thanks in Advance,

 

Ali

Not able to release Inspection Lot

$
0
0

Hello All,

 

Inspection lot is created after doing GR of Purchase Order through MIGO .System  Status of this inspection lot is CRTD PASG SPRQ & user status ZCRD .

During release the Inspection lot through QA02 , user status is changing as REL but after saving QA02 , I am getting update error as Error Info... Internal session terminated with runtime error SAPSQL_ARRAY_INSERT_DUPREC.

 

During debugging , we found that entry in Table QDQL is already exist and during release inspection lot , system is trying to update the same table with same primary keys which is already available in Table QDQL.

Even though  entry in QDQL is created two months back.

 

I want to know why this issue is coming as in the same table , I can see more than one entry for single material with increment of counter .But not able to get that why it is not appending for particular lot/material .

Also want to know the solution so that Inspection lot will be released.

 

I will appreciate your help in this regard.

 

Thanks

EREC - How to add photos from external candidates?

$
0
0

Hi,

 

In e-recruitment system, I want to know if it's possible to add photos to external candidates profile, like photos displayed on the internal profile?

 

 

Thanks for your help and best regards,

 

Daoyne

BAPI_SALESORDER_SIMULATE not working on similar lines as VA01

$
0
0

Hi All,

 

Thanks for reading the post.

 

  We have configured pricing condition for volume discount i.e. if the amount of SO is greater than X;  customer is given discount of y% on sales value.

 

  When we create sales order using VA01; pricing conditions are applied which includes volume discount say value P( p = y% of X).

 

   When we trigger BAPI_SALESORDER_SIMULATE with the same data; pricing conditions are applied but the pricing condition of volume discount is  showing as zero instead of P.

 

Regards,

Ganga

Dump VL10A during delivery splitting

$
0
0

Dears,

 

I have a legal requirement about  delivery items number, let's say 5 items as maximun value,

so I need to split the delivery when the max value is reached.

 

I've copied the   routine  FORM DATEN_KOPIEREN_001  , creating a new DATEN_KOPIEREN_601

 

I've assigned my own routine using transaction VTLA at header level. ( delivery = ZLF and sales order = ZTA).

 

The logic code  is easy : Each time the  item counter reach my  maximun  value, then  I move a new key to LIKP-ZUKRL.

 

When I run  VL01N transaction, this approach works fine!, but when VL10A is run got the  DUMP below:

 

User, transaction...

   

Client.............. 200

User................ "VMUNOZ"

Language key........ "S"

Transaction......... "VL10X "

Program............. "SAPLV05I "

Screen.............. "SAPLSLVC_FULLSCREEN 0500"

Screen line......... 5

   

Information on where termination occurred

   

The termination occurred in the ABAP/4 program "SAPLV05I " in

"SD_PARTNER_UPDATE".

The main program was "RVV50R10C ".

  The termination occurred in line 480

 

I've checked several notes trying to find out what is wrong , but nothing.

also I've verified the partner configuration  and also looks fine ..

 

I'll appreciate any advice

 

Victor

QPR4 confused message

$
0
0

We have one user is working one one sample at QA32/ QPR4 and same time if other user is trying to work on same sample at QPR4 then he gets error message saying - "Phys. sample &1 is already being processed by user &2."

 

In above message &1 is SAP user id and &2 is sample number, which looks totally confusing. I confirmed with developer that this is SAP bug. SAP developer changed the position of &1 and &2 in message. Now I'm looking for correction program but not able to find. I'm sure there should be something by SAP.

 

Have anyone come with same issue? What is correction program or SAP note?

Sales unit per Customer

$
0
0

Hello

 

I know that is possible to handle different sales units per distribution channel but is it possible to handle different sales units by customer?

Example:

Material XX has two sales units:

  • Sales unit CAR
  • Sales unit PAL

Two customers A and B belonging to the same distribution Channel

The sales order is handled for the customer A by CAR and for the customer B by PAL for the same material XX. Can i do it automatically?

 

Thanks in advance;


SAP PP

$
0
0

Hi Guru's,

 

I am facing Problem,

Quantity Difference found in Transaction MB51 & MCP9.

In Transact ion MB51 and MF12 the Quantity is match and it is correct.

But in MCP9 it shows Wrong. Same in table S225 it show wrong, same as MCP9.

So, please guide me in Same.

If any Sap Note is Required Pl. tell.

 

Thanks,

Tushar Barot 

Recruitment Process Sap-HR

$
0
0

Hii,

 

This is Anamika here,  I want to know the real time recruitment process & how thing are done.

 

Can anyone help me on this front?

 

Thank you,

Anamika Sharma

SAP SD Certified FRESHER

$
0
0

Could any open help me out to get placed as a Functional Consultant.

Inspection Type 06

$
0
0

Hi Expert,

 

Can you tell me plz what is the processed of 06 inspection type and required setting.

 

Regards,

 

Sunil Sharma

Enterprise Compensation Management:IT0759 Error Message

$
0
0

Hi All

 

We are currently working on EHP 6.0.While executing the report Change Compensation Process Status I am getting the following error .Although my employee in IT0759 is in approved status .Could you please guide me as to what could be the reason for the same.I am trying to execute the process through the backend R3 and not the portal

 

IT0759 issue.jpg

 

Thanks & Regards

Stuti

Customizing error in work schedule rule

$
0
0

Dear Guru

 

We have created new work schedule rule w.e.f.1st April-2013. following is the details

 

                                                       New                   Before

 

Employee subgroup grouping          2                     2
Holiday calendar                              S1                   G1
Personnel subarea grouping            01                   01
Work schedule rule                           DPUN             PAH2

 

and generated the work schedule rule from 042013 to 122013 and assigned newly created rule in feature "SCHKZ" are as under

Feature :- SCHKZ

A Active employee

|-   BTRTL Personnel Subarea

                  |- 1001

                          |-DPUN

           |-

                 otherwise

                   |- PAH2

Also assigned newly created calendar S1 to personal area. and assigned new work schedule rule DPUN to employee in IT7 w.e.f.01-04-2013 to 31-03-9999 before that other work schedule was assigned to the employee.

 

While executing the payroll for the month of April 2013 system are given error for previous work schedule 

"Customizing error in work schedule rule 2 S1 01 PAH2

 

If we hiring new employee and assigned new work schedule rule then system are generated payroll result.

 

So  pl help where we have  done mistake in customization.

 

Please suggest the same as it is very urgent as we have to change the work schedule rule to all the employee and run payroll for the month April-13.

 

Regards

Vijay

Enterprise Compensation Management:Buttons & input fields disabled.

$
0
0

Hi All

 

We are currently working on EHP6.0.After configuring standarad ECM with some basic enhanacements .Two plans salary adjustment and regular bonus as per the requirement the two plans are to be seen and executed under the same tab.But the Adjust Compensation and reopen rejection are greyed out .Also the input columns of Amount and % are greyed out .KIndly refer to the screen shots.Kindly guide as to what could be the reason behind the same because the confid done is SAP standard documentation.

 

Buttons and inpur fields.jpg

 

 

Thanks & Regards

Stuti


Can not find executable disp+work in path

$
0
0

Hi

SUM tool throws error 'Can not find executable disp+work in path <br/>' in extraction phase. Attached log for the same.

Kindly help me to solve this issue.

test.JPG

Regards

Mahesh Kumar

Assign multiple internal customer number for single sales organisation .

$
0
0

Dear Experts,

 

My requirement is to assign multiple internal customer number for one sales organisation in inter company customizing.

 

For below customizing, customer code (ABC) already exists, assignment of another new customer (XYZ) is not allowed, since the Sales org. internal customer number assignment is unique.

 

Path is :

SPRO >SD >Billing >Intercompany billing >Define internal customer number by sales organization.

 

 

Kindly help me to know, how to maintain multiple internal customer for one sales organisation for inter company customizing.

 

Thanks in advance

 

Regards

rampe

Sub Contracting - Receipt of Material which is not defined in BOM

$
0
0

Dear All,

 

We have sent Raw Material from our X plant to Y plant.

 

We have defined BOM    to produce Material "A" and cnsmption of Raw Material "R".

 

We have received material "A" and take the inward in X plant. Now Y plant has to send Discard  Cake (Zero Value) which is generated during process to X plant.

 

But by mistake in BOM Discard Cake is not defined as by product.

 

How can we take inward of Discard Cake in X plant ?

 

Thanks and Regards,

 

Nirav

Unplanned Delivery Costs in Logistic Invoice Verification

$
0
0

In SAP documents, we can find that it is possible to post unplanned delivery costs as tax code in logistic invoices. But my problem is:

in our organization, it is used to deducting 10% of contract in service cases to examine the level of service(for example to test the quality of painting of a building) and paying 90% at the final phase and paying 10% of contract 2 months later. Now, How should I model this? I mean is it possible to consider an item as tax code while it should be deduced from and not summed with costs?

MIGO GR for packed inbound deliv.

$
0
0

Hi All,

 

I have searched on google, SCN and OSS for an answer on my question but did not find a definite answer so I hope you guys can help me out.

 

Situation:

We are receiving ASN's from some of our vendors. In SAP these are transformed into inbound deliveries. Since these materials are packed into our returnable packaging we are packing these inbound deliveries so that the packaging material is included.

 

Issue:

Upon posting the goods receipt with MIGO only the goods receipt for the components is being executed. The packaging material still remains open in the inbound delivery. When posting the inbound delivery via VL32N the goods receipt for both the components and the returnable packaging is posted.

 

Inbound delivery before posting MIGO.png

 

Question:

We would like to have a uniform process for posting the goods receipts. Since not all our vendors are sending us inbound deliveries we can't use by default always VL32N to do the PGR.

Is there are way that when posting the GR via MIGO against an inbound delivery that also the goods receipt for the packaging material is being posted.

 

Inbound delivery after posting MIGO.png

Viewing all 2436 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>