Quantcast
Viewing all 2436 articles
Browse latest View live
↧

Material ledger Issue

May 13, 2013, 12:14 am
$
0
0

Hi Team,

Following the issue has been received from user.

 

While cancelling this MIGO document 5000063537 we are facing following ML issue “Error reading material ledger header record”.

 

And also we knows this cause of inconstancy issues (ML header not has been created). So we sent to SAP to create the ML header with MIGO document cancellation. And as per our request SAP created the ML header and canceled the MIGO document without account document and that is correct also.

 

And same issue we faced again with another material. And again we forward to SAP. But SAP has been created ML header data only. And this time we canceled the MIGO document our self. But the system has been created accounting document (reversal entries), ML document and CO-document with movement type 102.

 

And my user asking during MIGO there no subsequent document posting for accounting. But while reversal system has been generated accounting posting. How to correct the FI, CO, and ML document.

 

After that I sent to SAP this issue. And following the reply I received them.

 

The 101 movement type will create an accounting document and other

following documents for a valuated material. If the follow-on documents

are not created then it will create inconsistencies as you have seen

for the very document 5000063523 2013 which didn't create any follow-on

documents and thus affected MM, ML, FI and even PP areas. Internally,

this message had to be circulated to various components just to remove

inconsistencies caused by this single MM document. The colleagues from

all these areas had to contribute towards removing the inconsistencies

caused by this document. Such issues are time-consuming and are better

to be avoided least to mention the fact that they are categorized as

consulting issues rather than the normal support.

 

 

I would like to know how SAP can created without accounting posting during MIGO cancellation. And also they mentioned this consulting issue. And also I where I done the mistake.

 

Regards,

Bharathi

↧
Search

Manufacturing variance based on CKW1 Costs

May 13, 2013, 12:20 am
$
0
0

Hi,

 

My client is using CKW1 production lot cost estimate to do cost estimation during the month because CK11N will not allow them to do cost estimation during the month once there are goods movements. Hence if they want to recost a product after goods movement during a month they will use CKW1.

 

 

However now the requirement is, when the manufacturing variance is computed, they want the computation to be like this Actual costs minus CKW1 costs instead of the standard formula which is actual costs minus CK11N costs.

 

 

As far as i know, this is not possible because CKW1 costing will not update main stock valuation as it will only update the production lot based valuation. Hence the manufacturing variance will always be computed based on the CK11N costs.

 

 

Is there a way to overcome this problem by computing the manufacturing variance based on the CKW1 costs?

↧
↧

Functional Area hierarchy

May 13, 2013, 12:22 am
$
0
0

Hello,

 

Is it possible to create functional area hierarchy in system.

 

 

kind regards

↧

How to modify the VC in PMS form

May 13, 2013, 12:22 am
$
0
0

HI Experts,

 

We have developed PMS templates.

For  VC ,s we have created  Enter  objectives,where Appraiser writes the objectives.

At present system is showing greyed out Enter your Objectives.So Appraiser can't be able to enter the objectives for his reportees.

 

Our requirement is... it should not be greyed out and should be in editble mode and show the objective as typed by the appraiser.

Please advice me to do so.

 

Regards,

Sairam.

↧

Condition type missing in YF2

May 13, 2013, 12:23 am
$
0
0

Hi

 

In Sales, When creating YF2 billing type one of expected pricing condition type is missing.

However when carry out new pricing --> selected Price type C (Copy manual pricing elements and redetermine *) the condition type pop's up.

 

This is a manul entry condition type...

 

How to make this to appear automatic when sales billing document generated.

 

Regards

MM

↧
↧

dependency to upgrade sp7 to sp8 portal

May 13, 2013, 12:23 am
$
0
0

Hi All,

 

 

Currently we are using SAP Net Weaver 7.0 based on ehp5 and support patch level is sp7.

In SP 7 we are facing sp many issue so our client decided to upgrade the sp level sp8.

 

Is there any dependency to upgrade sp7 to sp8.

 

Thanks

↧

Offsetting Price Difference Account in Subsequent Debit MIRO

May 13, 2013, 12:42 am
$
0
0

Hello,

 

When I do the Subsequent Debit for a PO with the standard price material, credit is posted to vendor and Debit is posted to Price Difference account.

 

Now my question is how the posting to PRD account is cleared (offset). Can somebody clarify this.

 

Regards,

Sham.

↧

Authorization in ESS when MSS are structural

May 13, 2013, 12:49 am
$
0
0

Hi,

 

I have an issue when using structural authorization.

 

I have a manager and the manager role is structural. But he also has a employee role, which is NOT structural.

 

The user gets authorizations errors when using the employee role, but not the managerrole.

 

How to "overrule" the structural authorization when using the employee role?

 

BR

Kim

↧
Search

Import PO, VAT, Custom duty, China

May 13, 2013, 1:13 am
$
0
0

Hi Experts,

In China, for import PO, we need to pay both custom duty and VAT to custom. Custom duty will be added into inventory cost and VAT will not. VAT is deductable(so needs a tax code?).

Any suggestion?

Thank you.

Richard

↧
↧

WBS element wise Payment report

May 13, 2013, 1:13 am
$
0
0
Hi,
I have  reporting requirement as:
Header 1Header 2Header 3Header 4Header 5Header 6Header 7Header 8Header 9Header 10
WBS elementPlan costbudgetPO valueGRN valueInvoice ValueVendorAdvancesPaymentBalance Payment
Does anyone have came across this report.
Can this report be made in R/3 without having performance issues? Please share your suggestions.
Thanks,
Harsh.
↧

Ireland payroll issue - Getting Dump message while running the payroll

May 13, 2013, 11:25 pm
$
0
0

Hi folks,

 

For one employee there was retrospective change has been done due to change in his bike scheme. And when we are trying to run payroll for the particular employee we are getting the below error message:

 

Runtime Errors        TSV_TNEW_PAGE_ALLOC_FAILED

Short text:  No more storage space available for extending an internal table.

 

We are getting this error message for that particular employee only, for rest of the employees payroll is running correctly.

 

Scenario:

 

Employee retrospective change from period 10 2012.

Payroll run period: 06 – 2013.

Change in amount in his Bike scheme.

Payroll runs up to period 01-2013 but when it runs for the period 02-2012 we are getting the above dumb message.  Error message screen attached. Pls. suggest.

 

Thanks in advance.

Giriesh

↧

Organization Assignment

May 13, 2013, 11:29 pm
$
0
0

Dear Expert,

 

I would like to know how to adjust the EEGrp in Org Assignment (IT0001) from 2 (probation) to 1 (active EE)?

 

Where, there is a OU changes did in PPOME on 01.11.2012.

 

Below is the display in IT0001 for your references.

 

Start Date
CoCdPA
EEGrp
ESGrp
CostCenter
Org Unit
Position
Job key
01.11.2012A001AB01212C0015000011452000203
23.10.2012A001AB01112C0015000002052000203
23.04.2012A001AB01212C0015000002052000203

 

Action

23.04.2012 - Hiring

23.10.2012 - Confirmation

↧

batch determination issue for some materials

May 13, 2013, 11:46 pm
$
0
0

Hi

 

For one material A, i am getting batch is determined.in delivery automatically.

 

For 2nd material B , not getting batch detrmined automatically.Needs to select manually.What might be the reason ?

 

1. maintained batch search strategy via VCH1 material wise

 

2. Material 2 is fully copied wrt material A.

 

     ( Batch mgt active in Sales:General Data , plant storage 1 view )

     ( material class type , class & char.maintained under classification tab)

 

Sachin  K

↧
↧

parallel testing

May 13, 2013, 11:57 pm
$
0
0

hi, sap gurus i am new to sap hr, and i wanted to know who will perform parallel testing? if it performed by end users, how do we do data reconciliation with legacy system?

↧

Web screens are not showing up while creating PMS form

May 14, 2013, 12:01 am
$
0
0

Dear Experts,

 

We are into ECC 6.0 and EHP 4. But we don't have the portal.

  Our management decided to go with R/3 only.

  We developed several templates for different set of employees.

  We can able to view the web layout screen from the Transaction code PHAP_CATALOG.

  But when we are creating an appraisal form for the employees,everything are showing up in SAP R/3 screens.

 

Our requirement is to show up Appraisal form in web screens.

What should we do to have web screens.

Please advice me to move ahead.

 

Regards,

Sairam.

↧
Search

unable to edit quantity in TAPA line

May 14, 2013, 12:24 am
$
0
0

Hi all,

 

we use material determination, which displays the material determined as a sub item, in this context, i have a TAPA line ( line relevant for determination) & a TAN line which TAPA brings in, which is relevant for further processing.

 

lets say i have a sales order created for 100 PC, where A is the TAPA line & B ( determined material) for TAN line, since i only have 70 PC, i have confirmation against this.

 

now i had created delivery for 20 PC for B against this sales order & wish to change the order quantity to 20, but am not able to change the order quantity at TAPA level (even on TAN line) as the quantity field is greyed out.

 

need to understand if this is a standard functionality ( if so why was it designed this way).

 

Please let me know if any had a similar issue.

 

Regards

Ilango

↧

Dummy profit center

May 14, 2013, 12:39 am
$
0
0

Hello,

in our instalation some accounts than were created, like profit an loss, but not like cost element.When FI documents provide from

enviroment  "SD" or "MM", these accounts (profit and loss than are not cost element),imput in dummy profit center and generates profit center document.

If use the same account in FI transaction fb60 do not imput in dummy profit center and do not generate profit center document.

It is posible the same bahavior in enviroment "SD " and "MM":These accounts do not must generate profit center document never,

 

Many thanks

↧
↧

ATP – Include quality inspection stock

May 14, 2013, 12:44 am
$
0
0

Dear Experts,

 

I meet a problem when design ATP logic.

Sales order ATP logic as below (Z8+A), include quanlity inspection stock because we use QM function.

Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view. Capture1.PNG

 

Delivery ATP logic (Z8+B): we can not include QI stock because QI stock can not be delivered to cusotmer, other setting same as sales order ATP logic.

Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view. Capture2.PNG

 

Sales requirement are included in both sales order ATP and delivery ATP, because we do not allow sales person use
other salesman's stock.

 

 

During process sales order ATP, there is on hand stock 2000 + QI stock 8000 = 10000 PCs and there are two sales order item A 1000 PCs + B 9000 PCs = 10000 PCs are confirmed. Below is MD04 result.

Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view. Capture3.PNG

 

When we create delivery, current un-restricted use stock is 2000 PCs and we want to delivery 1000 PCs of sales order item A, but failed because system think sales order item B already confirmed with 7000 PCs. Message as below picture:

Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view. Capture4.PNG

 

In CO09 we can see "- 8000" PCs in cul.ATP column in item B line.

Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view. Capture5.PNG

 

Now we have to cancel confirmed quantity of sales order item B manually, then we can create delivery for sales order item A.

 

Please kindly advice any good idea to solve this problem.

 

Thanks with best regards

 

Jian

↧

Release Strategy - PO + Contract

May 14, 2013, 12:58 am
$
0
0

Hi Guys,

I'm having some problem creating the release strategy for PO and Contract .

 

Current Config:

 

Class: PURC_ORD_APP

Class Type: 032

 

Characteristic:

WERKS - Plant code

GNETW - Total Net Value

USRC2 - Value Exception Flag.

 

 

The above config was originally for PO release strategy, but right now, I need to add in some more strategy for Contract under the same Class.

 

Therefore, I created two new characteristic to separate by Document type and Document Category

 

New Characteristic added to Class: PURC_ORD_APP

 

Characteristic: BSTYP

TableName: EKKO

FieldName: BSTYP

Values: A, F, K, L

(Request for Quotation, Purchase Order, Contract, Scheduling Agreement respectively)

 

Characteristic: ESART

TableName: EKKO

FieldName: BSART

Values: NB, MK, ZR

(Purchase Order, Contract, Return Purchase Order respectively)

 

I've updated all the existing release strategy classification with the two new characteristic to separate them between those for POs and those for Contracts.

 

When I tried creating the Contract in ME31K, and releasing it in ME35K,

 

The release strategy wasn't able to get the the right one for Contract document type and category. Release Strategy for POs were being called up instead.

 

So am I doing something wrong?



Thanks



 

 

 

 


↧

Person edited was rejected *error*

May 14, 2013, 1:33 am
$
0
0

Hi Experts,

 

We are experiencing the error 'Person edited was rejected' while submitting the expense trip for approval on portal. However a day after when we tried again then this error doesn't comes up while submitting the same trip. It is an intermittent and irreplicable issue. Can anyone let me know what can cause this error and how it gets resolved automatically.

 

Regards,

 

Rahul.

↧
Viewing all 2436 articles
Browse latest View live
Search
<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>